top of page

Chevalia, The Way of the Horse, Book One, Chapter One

3 days ago
9 min read

Chapter One

The Silence That Nature Speaks

Long before I opened an ancient text or encountered philosophers or mystics, I sensed that the story the world was telling us was incomplete.

Something essential had been left out—something so quietly present that perhaps it could only be noticed where the noise of the world softened.

Church did not speak of it. Schools did not speak of it. Science circled around aspects of it, measuring what could be measured, but what I sensed seemed to exist beyond the boundaries of what could easily be named.

And yet it was everywhere.

I felt it in the wind moving through tall grass before a storm and in the stillness of a forest where the air itself seemed to listen. Unmistakably, I felt it among horses.

Horses know in a way that does not depend upon arguments or explanations. Their knowing moves through presence, through the body and breath, through an awareness that does not need to divide everything into concepts before it can respond to what is real.

Living among horses taught me that this awareness cannot be forced or demanded. The harder we pursue it, the more elusive it can become, because pursuit itself can keep the mind in control. Something different is required: openness, vulnerability, surrender, and the willingness to release what we think we already know.

There are evenings when the last light rests softly across the field and the horses become quiet. Their bodies relax and their breathing becomes slow and rhythmic. If I become still there with them—truly still—something begins to change.

The mind loosens its hold. Breath finds another rhythm. The identities and projections of the human world begin to recede until there is simply the horse, the breath, and awareness.

Sometimes, looking deeply into the pools of a horse's eyes, I have experienced something beyond ordinary observation: pure awareness, the pure witness of what is.

Tat Tvam Asi.

Thou art That.

No two moments are the same, and that is part of their truth. Presence cannot be manufactured or repeated like a technique. Each encounter is alive and entirely its own.

Yet within these moments I have known something that feels more real than the constructs through which we ordinarily understand ourselves: the shared field and the recognition that all is One, all is beauty, all is love.

The sense of standing next to the horse begins to soften. What remains is the recognition that horse and human are participating within the same living field.

This is difficult to describe because human language is built largely around separation: subject and object, observer and observed, self and other. The experience itself is different. There is awareness and communion, yet within that oneness the horse remains wholly horse and I remain myself.

Communion does not require either being to disappear into the other. There is a meeting, a recognition between two sovereign beings within something greater that holds us both.

This is one of the truths the horses would continue to deepen in me over many years.

They do not need to theorize about the field. They live within the immediacy of life, and because they do, they can reveal what we bring into relationship with them.

A horse can feel the difference between what we project and what we actually embody. We may present confidence while carrying fear. We may perform calmness while inwardly divided. We may approach with an identity carefully constructed for the human world, but the horse has no investment in maintaining that identity for us.

The horse meets what is there.

This is why what humans call a horse's “misbehavior” sometimes deserves deeper attention. What we are seeing may not simply be defiance or failure in the horse. We may be encountering a response to our own incoherence, tension, uncertainty, expectation, or something within ourselves we have not yet been willing to see.

The horse can become a mirror, but the horse does not exist to fix us, nor should every behavior of a horse be interpreted as something about the human being. The horse is a sovereign being with an experience of its own.

Relationship with such a sensitive being, however, leaves very little room for pretense.

That is part of what makes the horse such an extraordinary teacher. Their physical presence commands respect. Their sensitivity demands awareness. When we are willing to step outside the restless noise of the mind and meet them without the masks we carry into so much of human life, they can bring us face to face with ourselves.

The modern world has trained us to associate intelligence primarily with the thinking mind. Living among horses challenged that assumption for me.

Thinking is an extraordinary human capacity, but it is not the only way of knowing. There is an intelligence of presence.

Horses sense tension before we speak. They perceive fear before we explain it. They respond to changes in posture, breath, intention, attention, and emotional state that we ourselves may not yet consciously recognize. Their awareness reminds us that intelligence is not confined to thought. It moves through the whole being, through the body and breath, through relationship, and through the subtle communication continually taking place between living beings.

This is why horses can be such honest companions. Appearances are of little use to them.

A person may project confidence, calmness, or authority, but if something within is fractured or fearful, the horse may respond to what lies beneath the performance. That response can become an invitation to become coherent, to become present, and to return to ourselves.

Before I knew anything of philosophy or studied ancient teachings, the horses were already showing me this. They were not giving me information. They were changing the way I perceived.

What Stary had shown me went even deeper.

The powerful current I had felt moving from her into me had changed the way I understood the body itself. I could no longer think of myself as merely physical. I had experienced energy moving through my own body with such strength and brilliance that every cell seemed to come alive. Whatever language I would later use to describe it, I knew what I had felt.

That experience opened something within me that I did not yet know how to explain. I began to understand ourselves as energetic beings, beings of light as well as physical form, and I became deeply curious about the relationship between consciousness, energy, and healing.

Because this was all new to me, I began exploring other healing modalities, hoping to better understand what Stary had awakened within me. Yet I repeatedly found that what had come through my communion with her felt far more powerful than anything I was being taught through an established practice.

During one healing workshop, several of us were working around the same person. The woman receiving the session could feel what was coming through me so distinctly that I was asked what I was doing differently from the others. I had no formal name for it. I was working intuitively with techniques that had begun unfolding within me from that original experience with Stary.

I found myself sharing some of those techniques with others in the workshop.

That experience stayed with me because it reinforced something I was beginning to understand: Stary had not simply introduced me to an unfamiliar concept. Something had been exchanged between us. She had illuminated something within me and opened a capacity I would spend years exploring.

Some people were receptive to what I was discovering. Others were not.

Within much of my immediate religious community, family, and the society around me, what I was doing seemed to provoke fear. I was strongly chastised for practicing energy healing. I was told that it was of Satan and that working with crystals was evil. What I had experienced as loving, beautiful, and sacred was regarded by some of the people around me as something dangerous.

Their response saddened me, but it also made me curious.

I did not stop.

My own experience had been too immediate for me to deny simply because it fell outside what others had been taught to accept. I continued exploring and practicing healing, but I learned to keep much of it to myself.

And then, rather wonderfully, there was my father.

He became the first person in my family to quietly cross that boundary. He lived about an hour away, yet one day he appeared at my house rather nonchalantly, explaining that he was simply stopping by on his way to go fishing. Eventually he asked if I might do a healing session for him.

He wasn't going fishing. He had come for the healing.

I found it adorable.

Something about that moment softened what had otherwise been a difficult experience. Beneath the fear, judgment, and resistance surrounding what I was doing, there could still be curiosity. People did not always say openly what they were beginning to wonder about.

For me, however, there was no going back to the way I had understood the world before Stary.

I had experienced something first. Only afterward did I go looking for language, practices, and traditions that might help me understand it. Again and again, I would discover that the most profound teachings in my life did not begin within institutions. They began through direct experience.

Stary had already shown me that.

That difference has become essential to Chevalia.

We do not simply learn their way. We remember.

Learning can accumulate knowledge, while remembering can reveal what was already within us.

When the mind becomes quiet enough, another dimension of the living world can become perceptible. It need not arrive through spectacle or dramatic revelation. Often it comes through recognition: the quiet certainty that the world is far more alive than we have been taught to believe.

Nature lives this without explanation. Animals live within relationships and sensory worlds that human beings have often diminished because we cannot fully enter or measure them.

Across many ancient cultures, animals were not regarded merely as lesser creatures existing beneath human consciousness. They appeared as companions, guides, messengers, and participants in a greater order of life.

The longer I have lived closely among animals, especially horses, the harder it has become for me to accept the assumption that humanity occupies some unquestioned highest rung of awareness.

We are extraordinary beings, but we are not the only extraordinary beings.

Perhaps what separates us from much of the natural world is not superiority, but the degree to which we have become distracted from our own participation within it.

The animals have not abandoned nature. Neither have the forests, rivers, oceans, mountains, or trees. We are nature as well.

We have simply constructed ways of living that can make us forget, and so nature can become the way we remember.

For me, the horse became one of the most profound guides into that remembrance. This is not because the horse is more sacred than other life. All life is sacred.

There is, however, something particular about the horse—its immense physical presence, sensitivity, power, vulnerability, awareness, and capacity for relationship—that can bring a human being very quickly into the immediacy of the present moment.

You cannot truly meet a horse while remaining entirely inside an abstraction. The horse is here, and to enter relationship, eventually we must become here too.

This is where the journey of Chevalia begins: in fields, in breath, in relationship, and in the silent understanding that can arise between a human being and a horse when neither is reduced to what the other can provide.

It would be many years before I discovered that some of what the horses were revealing to me had been contemplated long ago.

I encountered ancient texts born from stillness and inquiry, writings from people attempting to describe realities they had experienced directly and for which ordinary language was often inadequate. They spoke of consciousness, the Self, the Tao, the visible world and realities beyond ordinary perception, and the possibility that separation is not as absolute as it appears.

When I eventually encountered these writings, their importance to me did not come from authority. It came from recognition.

I had experienced something first, and then I discovered that others, across centuries and cultures, had also tried to put words around something that felt deeply familiar.

This order matters.

The texts did not teach me what to experience with the horses. The horses had already opened the door. The texts gave me another language through which to explore what had been revealed.

Ancient traditions call this deeper recognition by many names: awakening, realization, liberation, remembrance. For me, the simplest word remains remembering.

The deeper self has not disappeared. Our relationship with the living world has not disappeared. The intelligence moving through life has not disappeared. We have become distracted from it.

The horse does not need us to turn the horse into a spiritual symbol in order to lead us back. The living horse is enough.

To share life with horses—to care for them, observe them, listen to them, move with them, be challenged by them, and sometimes simply become quiet among them—is to enter a relationship that continually asks us to become more present to what is actually here.

When we do, the world begins to change, or perhaps our perception of it does.

The boundaries we assumed were fixed begin to feel less certain: human and nature, inner and outer, self and other, visible and invisible.

Questions begin to open that cannot yet be answered. What is this awareness that watches beneath thought? What is consciousness? Why can a moment of complete presence feel more real than the identities through which we spend so much of our lives? What is the field we sometimes sense between ourselves and another living being? And what happens when we stop assuming that human thought is the measure of everything that exists?

Those questions will take us deeper.

The journey begins somewhere much simpler—with a breath, a quiet field, a horse, and the willingness to listen.

Comments


bottom of page